Cases 21 - 30 of 710
Fisher v. Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sally Fisher
Defendant:
City of Columbus, Andrew Ginther, Ned Pettus, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Bates v. Clark et al.
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bates
Defendant:
Heidi Clark, Patty and Giant Eagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawan M. Johnson
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Director's Desi B. Turner, Warden Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. Healy
as 5:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Terry Clark
Respondent:
Warden Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duncan v. Darke County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Adam Duncan
Defendant:
Darke County Sheriff's Office, Thomas Combs, Stephen Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Phipps et al
as 2:2023cv04203
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, Michael Cassone and Alex Castle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Clark v. CVS Health Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
CVS Health Pharmacy, Inc., Aetna Resources, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. Littler Mendelson PC et al
as 2:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Littler Mendelson PC, Richard DeAgazio, Alex Frondorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv04201
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Wendy Williams and Southeast Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
