Cases 21 - 30 of 4,725
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11394
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11395
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11400
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv11401
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc. v. Does 1-100 et al
as 1:2024cv11363
Plaintiff:
Bravado International Group Merchandising Services, Inc.
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Paquin v. Fritch et al
as 3:2024cv30074
Plaintiff:
John Paquin
Defendant:
Arthur Fritch, III and Massachusetts Convention Center Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Magee v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11357
Plaintiff:
John Magee
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AppProved Software Corporation et al v. Sing et al
as 1:2024cv11325
Plaintiff:
AppProved Software Corporation and John Miller
Defendant:
Sunil Sing, Apple, Inc. and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
