Cases 21 - 30 of 313
Larsen et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 3:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Lief Larsen and Casey Larson
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 231
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ada Removal- Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Mallard v. Spangler, et al.
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Chansler Mallard
Defendant:
Mason Spangler, Gray, Justin Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
River City Testing, et al v. Jack Cohen, et al
as 5:2020cv02198
Defendant:
Craig Rush, Eric France, Jack Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
River City Testing, Stephen Potter and Rob Schumacher
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Daniel Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Wang v. City of Cupertino et al
as 5:2022cv06822
Plaintiff:
Jane Wang
Defendant:
City of Cupertino, Phillip Willkomm, Joyce Fung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Butler v. Kelso et al
as 2:2022cv01301
Plaintiff:
Darius Butler
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Richard Kirkland, Lisa Heintz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jose Luis Padilla v. W S V D Medical et al
as 5:2022cv01570
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Padilla
Defendant:
W S V D Medical, MD Chalary, Nutritionist W.V.D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
