Cases 21 - 30 of 323
Obhof v. May
as 1:2023cv02000
Petitioner:
Dannail Obhof
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
May v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
Terrance May
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Mahoning County Commissioners, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera-Fontanez v. May
as 1:2023cv01830
Petitioner:
William Rivera-Fontanez
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. May
as 2:2023cv02790
Petitioner:
Gerald G. Scott
Respondent:
Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Butler et al
as 3:2023cv01611
Plaintiff:
Martin Robinson
Defendant:
Ohio State Patrol Lonnie Butler, V. Brown Legal Services, OH Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODR&C) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bridges v. Blackmon et al
as 1:2023cv01481
Plaintiff:
Andrey L. Bridges
Defendant:
Patricia A. Blackmon, Mary J. Boyle, Frank D. Celebrezze, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. May
as 3:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Gerald G. Scott
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Warrensville Social Security
as 1:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Juan Ahmad Mays
Defendant:
Warrensville Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2023cv01290
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris, Jacob Blake, Bianca Austin and others
Defendant:
City of Akron, Police Chief Stephen L. Mylett, Mayor Daniel Horrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
