Cases 21 - 30 of 183
Scott v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter R. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Ley v. Ace Hardware Corp.
as 2:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Bennett Ley
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Implicit, LLC v. Ace Hardware Corporation
as 4:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Implicit, LLC
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LINFO IP, LLC v. Ace Hardware Corporation
as 6:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
LINFO IP, LLC
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Fourstar Group USA, Inc. v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 8:2021cv02787
Plaintiff:
Fourstar Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation and ShawShank LEDz Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Seoul Semiconductor Co et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation
as 6:2021cv01060
Plaintiff:
Seoul Semiconductor Co and Seoul Viosys Co.
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
FILING ERROR
as 1:2021cv00912
Plaintiff:
Seoul Semiconductor Co and Seoul Viosys Co.
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Williams et al v. Rees et al
as 3:2021cv02301
Plaintiff:
Deniquwia Williams and Laquita Buckle
Defendant:
Geralda Rees and Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
