Cases 21 - 30 of 181
Montes et al v. Terry Palecek, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01139
Defendant:
Daniel Richard Pospichal and Terry Palecek, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hector Montes, Jr., a minor, Nancy Acevedo, Annie Montes, a minor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acevedo v. M.P.S.K. Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07332
Plaintiff:
Edward Acevedo
Defendant:
M.P.S.K. Inc., d/b/a The Syber Technology Group, an Illinois Corporation, Michael Powell, individually, M.P.S.K. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rhodes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv06796
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Rhodes
Defendant:
Officer Donnelly, Star No. 13784, Officer Hernandez, Star No. 15925, Officer Wolinski, Star No. 2605 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Saul
as 1:2019cv06211
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Acevedo
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew M. Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
O'Connor v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv05100
Defendant:
J Bowers, Department Head Smith, Anissa Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Valentina O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02911
Plaintiff:
Nelida Soto Acevedo
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Acevedo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv02014
Plaintiff:
Graciela Acevedo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Acevedo v. Target Corporation
as 1:2018cv06969
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Silvia Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2018cv06698
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Aaron Acevedo
Plaintiff:
Booker Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
