Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mysovskaya v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv06080
Defendant:
Acting Secretary DHS Chad Wolf, Lee Bowes, Kenneth T Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Olga Mysovskaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pustynnova v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv06084
Defendant:
Director of USCIS Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Acting Secretary DHS Chad Wolf, Lee Bowes and others
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Pustynnova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dong v. Cioppa et al
as 1:2020cv05191
Defendant:
District Director Thomas Cioppa, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli and Acting Secretary DHS Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Yanxian Dong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
