Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Beaulieu et al v. Alabama Onsite Wastewater Board et al
as 2:2008cv00432
Plaintiff:
Henri N. Beaulieu, Sr., Henri N. Beaulieu, Sr., Henri N. Beaulieu, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Onsite Wastewater Board, Carolyn Gibson, Melissa Hines and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Community Home Health v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 7:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
Community Home Health, Community Home Health and Community Home Health
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Michael O Leavitt, State of Alabama Department of Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Abner v. Alabama Board of Medical Examiners et al
as 2:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
Janice Abner
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Medical Examiners and The Alabama Department of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
