Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Hanna v. East Carroll Parish et al
as 3:2010cv01059
Plaintiff:
Mark Hanna
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept East Carroll Parish, Alvin Jones, Ronnie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00478
Plaintiff:
Dennis D Thomas
Defendant:
Alvin Jones, James Shaw, Greg Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selders v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv00881
Petitioner:
James Selders
Respondent:
Alvin Jones and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lanus v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv00712
Petitioner:
Alvin Lanus
Respondent:
Alvin Jones and James D. Caldwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Riverbend Detention Center Phase II et al
as 3:2009cv00293
Plaintiff:
Tobias D Fields
Defendant:
Riverbend Detention Center Phase II, Pulsy, Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Georgetown v. Jones et al
as 3:2009cv00092
Petitioner:
George Georgetown
Respondent:
Alvin Jones and James D. Caldwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Folse v. Jones et al
as 3:2008cv00717
Plaintiff:
Daryl Folse
Defendant:
Alvin Jones, Sheriffs Dept East Carroll Parish, Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv01424
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Young
Defendant:
Alvin Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Young v. Jones et al
as 2:2008cv00888
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Young
Defendant:
Alvin Jones
Respondent:
Charles C. Foti, Jr. and Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drake v. Jones et al
as 3:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Shawn Drake
Defendant:
Alvin Jones and Pearly Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
