Cases 21 - 30 of 8,724
Andrew Thompson et al v. State Farm General Insurance Company et al
as 5:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMPSON and HEATHER THOMPSON
Defendant:
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ANDREA ACEVEDO and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
v. Federal Corrections Institute - Dublin et al
as 3:2024cv03318
Defendant:
Federal Corrections Institute - Dublin, Nicholas Ramos and Mr. Andrew Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Rose v. Matterport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03313
Plaintiff:
Andrew Rose
Defendant:
Matterport, Inc., RJ Pittman, Mike Gustafson and others
William Joiner v. Channel 5 LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
William G Joiner
Defendant:
Channel 5 LLC, Andrew Callaghan, Evan Gilbert-Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510 Wire Interception
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rojas v. City of Gilroy et al
as 5:2024cv03206
Plaintiff:
Joe Rojas
Defendant:
City Of Gilroy, Michael McMahon, Officer Stanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Klobus v. Akero Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Dora Klobus
Defendant:
Akero Therapeutics, Inc., Andrew Cheng, William White and others
Espoire Ishibolecho v. Andrews DHS Attorney Gen
as 5:2024cv01043
Petitioner:
Espoire Ishibolecho
Respondent:
Andrews DHS Attorney Gen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Andrews v. Lee
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Donna Lee Andrews
Defendant:
Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levit v. Nature's Bakery, LLC
as 3:2024cv02987
Plaintiff:
Andrew Levit
Defendant:
Nature's Bakery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
