Cases 21 - 30 of 416
Sparadeo v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Zachary Sparadeo
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernandez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fernandez
Defendant:
Semple and Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
David George Williams
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Richard Parker
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Sharonda Carlos, Robert Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birch v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Birch
Defendant:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Darryl Crenshaw
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Yesu, Zuckerbraun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Andrews, II
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
