Cases 21 - 30 of 3,387
Schargorodsky v. Ek et al
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schargorodsky
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Jennifer Chacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Hart et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
Eazs A. Harper
Defendant:
C/O Hart, C/O Bent, Nurse Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demus v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
James Demus
Defendant:
Alfredo Maldonado, Anthony Plaid, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anguis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
Anthony Anguis
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins et al v. Auffenberg
as 3:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Anthony Collins and James Powell
Defendant:
Christopher Auffenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
