Cases 21 - 30 of 68
ARIS HORTICULTURE, INC. et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 5:2018cv01817
Plaintiff:
ARIS HORTICULTURE, INC. and ARIS LAND HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aris Horticulture, Inc. et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 1:2018cv00900
Plaintiff:
Aris Horticulture, Inc. and Aris Land Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bailey v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Blake R. Davis, M. D. Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bailey v. Brandler et al
as 3:2017cv02106
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Bruce Brandler, G. Michael Thiel and Joanne Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CENTINO v. UNITED REFRIGERATION, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv04820
Plaintiff:
ARIS CENTINO
Defendant:
UNITED REFRIGERATION, INC., RICHARD EHRIG, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
OREN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv04627
Petitioner:
ARIE OREN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Ebbert
as 3:2017cv00441
Petitioner:
Ari Bailey
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
OREN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2016cv03896
Petitioner:
ARIE OREN
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
