Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00613
Defendant:
Advance Technologies Group, N. Grimes, J. Hollingsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Autry Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jones v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00913
Petitioner:
Autry Lee Jones
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEYVA v. ENDEAVOR PETROLEUM, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv00045
Defendant:
ENDEAVOR PETROLEUM, LLC, Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. and Autry C Stephens
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEYVA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Buehler v. The City of Gonzales, et al
as 5:2015cv00168
Defendant:
Officer Gayle Autry, The City of Gonzales and Officer Tammy West
Plaintiff:
Antonio F Buehler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00136
Plaintiff:
Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Advanced Stimulation Technologies, Inc., Billy Williams, Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00058
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Caner v. Autry et al
as 4:2013cv00494
Plaintiff:
Ergun M. Caner
Defendant:
Jonathan Autry and Jason Smathers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv00199
Petitioner:
Autry Lee Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rafferty et al v The National Football League
as 4:2012cv02302
Plaintiff:
Thomas Rafferty , Miller Farr , Simeon Rice and others
Defendant:
The National Football League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AUTRY
as 2:2012mc00199
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
STANLEY AUTRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
