Cases 21 - 30 of 964
WALTER v. DBNCH CIRCLE LLC
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN WALTER
Defendant:
DBNCH CIRCLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PRUDHOMME v. MICHELS & BOOTH PA et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ADAM J PRUDHOMME
Defendant:
MICHELS & BOOTH PA, MARCUS MICHLES, RAINEY BOOTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
WALTERS v. TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN WALTERS and ADRIAN WALTER
Defendant:
TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Adrian Evans
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo et al v. Nuerorehab Services LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Miguel Carrillo, Joe Cabrera and Kevin Mirelez
Defendant:
Nuerorehab Services LLC, Sanar Management LLC, Sanar Management LLC doing business as Nuero Rehab Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hardy, Adrian v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60248
Plaintiff:
Adrian Hardy
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Adrian Williams
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. CAMPBELL
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN PEREZ
Defendant:
CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Union Correction Institution
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Russell
Defendant:
Union Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Adrian Clark
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
