Cases
Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Corral et al v. Air China Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00356
Plaintiff: Velia Corral, Nicholas Uhl, Jeffrey Uhl and others
Defendant: Air China Limited and Chinaspree.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Air China Limited v. Tran et al
as 1:2009cv01288
Plaintiff: Air China Limited
Defendant: Troung Duy Tran, Northwest Bakery, Inc., Neustar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Air China Limited v. AIRCHINA.COM
as 08-1751
Plaintiff - Appellee: AIR CHINA LIMITED
Defendant - Appellant: AIRCHINA.COM, in rem and JINSU KIM, current registrant of domain
Defendant - None: VERISIGN, INCORPORATED, as Registry and GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INCORPORATED, as Registrar
Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Air China Limited et al
as 1:2008cv00983
Plaintiff: Payless Shoesource, Inc.
Defendant: Air China Limited, Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane, S.p.A., All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Uti, United States, Inc. v. Mandarin Airlines, Ltd. et al
as 2:2007cv08297
Plaintiff: Uti, United States, Inc. and Uti, United States, Inc.
Defendant: Mandarin Airlines, Ltd., Air China Limited, Air China International Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Air China Limited v. et al
as 1:2007cv01089
Plaintiff: Air China Limited
Defendant: Verisign Inc., Go Daddy Software, Inc. and Airchina.Com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Uti, United States, Inc. v. Air China Limited et al
as 2:2007cv05063
Plaintiff: Uti, United States, Inc. and Uti, United States, Inc.
Defendant: Air China Limited, Air China International Corporation, Air China Cargo, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?