Cases 21 - 30 of 80,833
Clayton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05387
Plaintiff:
Ratonia Ray Clayton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05386
Plaintiff:
Paul Dixon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05388
Plaintiff:
Catherine Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordy v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Michael J Gordy
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thunstrom v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Angela Thunstrom
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Donini v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Linda A Donini
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rios v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Dessirae M Rios
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ranchod v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Suresh U Ranchod
Defendant:
AIG Property Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Bacon et al v. Grand Design RV LLC
as 3:2024cv05384
Plaintiff:
George R Bacon and Kimberly Bacon
Defendant:
Grand Design RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
