Cases 21 - 30 of 40
United States of America v. A 2013 Black Ford Flex et al
as 5:2017cv05148
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A 2013 Black Ford Flex, $7,438.00 in United States Currency seized from a 2013 Black Ford Flex, $11,257.00 in United States Currency seized from 2711 W. Garrett Road and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Grote v. Arvest Bank et al
as 5:2017cv05069
Plaintiff:
Will Grote
Defendant:
Arvest Bank, Sabrina C. Cooper and Arkansas Notary Bonding, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00347
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02261
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Hajny et al v. Arvest Bank
as 4:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Hajny and J&J Virtual Communications LLC
Defendant:
Arvest Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Dennis Allen Construction Co., Inc. v. Secretary of Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2012cv03061
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allen Construction Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Secretary of Army Corps of Engineers , Buzzard Roost Harbor, Inc. , Charles W. Thitoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
HCA-Information Technology & Services Inc v. Shiloh Health Services Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00012
Plaintiff:
HCA-Information Technology & Services Inc
Defendant:
Shiloh Health Services Inc and Medical Park Hospital
Garnishee:
Arvest Bank
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02086
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02088
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02087
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
