Cases 21 - 30 of 39
In Re: Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2012md02409
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Local 595 Health And Welfare Fund, All Plaintiffs, New York Hotel Trades Council and Hotel Assoc. of New York City, Inc. Health Benefits Fund and others
Interested Party:
CaremarkPCS Health, LLC, Value Drug Company, McKesson Corporation and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF LOUISIANA, INC., CARITEN INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Intervenor:
Express Scripts, Inc., Christopher Wirth, Edward Breivik and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc., TEVA USA, INC. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation
Petitioner:
Mr. TIMOTHY C. HESTER
In Re:
Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Allied Services Division Welfare Fund v. Astrazeneca LP et al
as 1:2012cv12263
Plaintiff:
Allied Services Division Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Astrazeneca LP, Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astrazeneca AB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Astrazeneca AB et al
as 1:2012cv12203
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Health Benefits Fund
Defendant:
Astrazeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, AstraZeneca, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
American Sales Company, LLC v. Astrazeneca AB et al
as 1:2012cv11711
Plaintiff:
American Sales Company, LLC
Defendant:
Astrazeneca AB, Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astrazeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Professional Drug Company, Inc. v. ASTRAZENECA AB et al
as 1:2012cv11609
Plaintiff:
Professional Drug Company, Inc.
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bertrand et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 4:2010cv40039
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bertrand and James Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
as 4:2010cv40038
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Citizens for Consume, et al v. Abbott Laboratories,, et al
as 1:2001cv12257
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Consumer Justice , Colorado Progressive Coalition , Congress of California Seniors and others
Defendant:
Allergan Worldwide , Astrazeneca US , Bayer, AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Shirley Geller , United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midest Health Benefits Fund , Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. , Fujisawa Pharmaceut, Monsanto CO. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Roberta S. Starks , Kimberly K. Hoover , National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Amicu:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY a/k/a BRISTOL-MYERS ONCOLOGY DIVISION/HIV PRODUCTS , GENSIA SICOR, INC., Novartis AG and others
Movant:
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield , Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization, Inc., Neighborhood Health Plan, Inc. and others
Adr_provider:
Eric Green and Jonathan Marks
Respondent:
Luis E. Cobo
Objector:
Patricia Weatherly and James W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of Utah v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 1:2008cv10579
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of Utah, State of Utah and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Astrazeneca, Bayer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
