Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01182
Defendant:
Mr. Acevado, David Ackerschott, Sharon Ackerschott and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Imhotep Jordan Jr. v. Audrey B. Collins
as 2:2012cv01208
Defendant:
Audrey B. Collins
Plaintiff:
Imhotep Jordan, Jr
Aaron Raiser v. Yevette Lois et al
as 5:2012cv00045
Defendant:
Sharon Hall Brown, Audrey B Collins, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Raiser
MOTEN v. HATCH et al
as 1:2011cv01556
Plaintiff:
JESSE T. MOTEN
Defendant:
ORRIN HATCH, AUDREY B. COLLINS, ANTHONY W. ISHII and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
-JC Carmen D Crites v. Kenneth S Apfel
as 2:1999cv12201
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel
Unknown:
Audrey B Collins
Plaintiff:
Carmen D Crites
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniel David Dydzak v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 2:2011cv05560
Defendant:
Judge Percy Anderson, Marvin R Baxter, California Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Movant:
United States of America
Carmen Lopez-Cham v. Kenneth S Apfel
as 2:2000cv10299
Defendant:
Kenneth S Apfel
Unknown:
Audrey B Collins
Plaintiff:
Carmen Lopez-Cham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tanesha Blye, et al v. Alex Kozinski, et al
as 10-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TANESHA WALLS BLYE, JOEL D. JOSEPH, DENNIS E. WIESSNER, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, NINTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL COUNCIL, DAVID R. THOMPSON and others
Daniel David Dydzak v. Ronald M. George et al
as 2:2010cv05820
Defendant:
Lucy Armendariz, Marvin R. Baxter, Board of Governors of State Bar of California and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Movant:
United States of America
Ryan Lindsay Brewer v. Audrey B. Collins
as 2:2010cv04157
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lindsay Brewer
Defendant:
Audrey B. Collins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
