Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Benefield
as 1:2012cv02883
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Jimmy V. Benefield
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Henderson v. Scott et al
as 1:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
Prince Lester J. Henderson
Defendant:
David K. Scott, Marc E. Ripps, Kristen L. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Georgia Legislature et al
as 1:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Georgia Legislature, Superior Court of Clayton County, Superior Court of Bibb County and others
Movant:
James E. Harris, Jamall D. Mathis, Antonio Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jamison et al v. Air Line Pilots Association, International et al
as 1:2012cv00544
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Jamison, John Cartwright, David Edward Marcu and others
Defendant:
Air Line Pilots Association, International and Lee Moak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Benefield v. Horton
as 4:2010cv00076
Plaintiff:
Wanda Benefield
Defendant:
Amy Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benefield v. Horton
as 3:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wanda Benefield
Defendant:
Amy Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Benefield et al
as 1:2008cv03643
Plaintiff:
Miles T. Lee
Defendant:
Harold Benefield, State of Georgia, Thurmond Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Benefield et al
as 1:2008cv03642
Plaintiff:
Miles T. Lee
Defendant:
Harold Benefield, State of Georiga, Thurmond Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benefield v. Makita Corporation of America
as 1:2007cv00064
Plaintiff:
Wayne Benefield
Defendant:
Makita Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
