Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Baccus v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv11341
Plaintiff:
Betty Baccus
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christy et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2018cv11039
Plaintiff:
Wayne Christy and Betty Christy
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2018cv11043
Plaintiff:
Betty J. Burns and Jack Burns
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2018cv10254
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Betty Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shuman v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv11104
Plaintiff:
Betty Shuman
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp , Stryker Sales Corporation and Stryker Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sadler v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2017cv10681
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Sadler
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02768
Defendant:
Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Head Products Liability Litigation, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Surgi-Care, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Saunders, Paul Loizzo, Betsy Perez and others
Interested Party:
Willard J. Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Strickland v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv11869
Plaintiff:
Betty Strickland
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Glanton v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv10928
Defendant:
Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Betty D. Glanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
