Cases 21 - 30 of 769
Gilbert et al v. Baker Hughes Inc
as 3:2015cv00334
Plaintiff:
Andre Gilbert and Chad Thomas
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Baker Hughes Inc., et al v. S&S Chemical, LLC, et al
as 15-2413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BAKER HUGHES INC. and BAKER PETROLITE CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
S&S CHEMICAL, LLC, BRUCE NEAL STEVENS and SPE WAX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Hebert v. Baker Hughes Inc et al
as 6:2015cv02566
Plaintiff:
Frederique Hebert
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Inc and Baker Hughes Inteq Drilling Fluids Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00839
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
TRIUVA Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v. Baker Hughes, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv02744
Plaintiff:
TRIUVA Kapitalverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Defendant:
Baker Hughes, Inc. and Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker Petrolite Corp. et al v. S&S Chemical, LLC et al
as 4:2015mc01575
Plaintiff:
Baker Petrolite Corp. and Baker Hughes Inc.
Defendant:
S&S Chemical, LLC, Bruce Neal Stevens and SPE Wax Technologies, LLC
Movant:
TM Chemicals Limited Partnership
Lebrun v. Baker Hughes Inc et al
as 6:2015cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lebrun
Defendant:
Transocean Ltd and Baker Hughes Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hurst v. Baker Hughes, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01819
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Hurst
Defendant:
Baker Hughes, Inc., Seadrill Americas, Inc. , Hess Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
