Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Seal 3 v. USA
as 1:2013cv00157
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tony Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barber et al v. Rendinell et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Barber and Susan Barber
Defendant:
James B. Rendinell , Renco Roofing Corporation , The Vector Building Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Barber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00258
Plaintiff:
Stanley D. Barber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00143
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Higgs v. Easterling et al
as 3:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
James Carl Higgs
Defendant:
Stafford Easterling, LaDonna Thompson, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00127
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Ocoee v. Louisville Metro Housing Authority, Sec. 8 et al
as 3:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
Springwater Ocoee
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Housing Authority, Sec. 8, Louisville Metro Police Department, Robert White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber v. SSA
as 6:2010cv00189
Plaintiff:
Charles Franklin Barber
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barber v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00082
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, Inc. , Dollar General Partners , Dolgencorp of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Barber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
