Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Pugh v. Cole et al
as 5:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Leroy David Pugh
Defendant:
L. Cole and J. Barclay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sheldon Barclay v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
as 1:2012cv03030
Defendant:
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Barclay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. MetLife, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02626
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant:
MetLife, Inc. , C. Robert Henrikson , William J. Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barclay v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Elandra Barclay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thomas v. Allred et al
as 2:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
H Allred , Sandra Johnson, Leotis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barclay v. United States of America
as 5:2011cv08041
Petitioner:
Tionne Barclay
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Confederate Motors, Inc. v. Terny, et al
as 2:2010cv00919
Plaintiff:
Confederate Motors, Inc.
Defendant:
Francois-Xavier Terny, Nick Apostomtos, Samir Bader and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Barclay et al v. Boyd et al
as 5:2009cv02127
Plaintiff:
Betty Rose Barclay and Kenneth Barclay
Defendant:
Ralph Duane Boyd and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rodgers v. Medlen et al
as 2:2009cv01780
Plaintiff:
Elzie S Rodgers, Jr
Defendant:
Joanie Medlen, Catherine Calloway, Wanda Savage and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Barclay
as 2:2009cv01246
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Elise Barclay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
