Cases filed in Maryland
Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Macewen et al v. Medical Practices of Antietam, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01390
Plaintiff: Daniel B Macewen and Barrett M Peitz
Defendant: Medical Practices of Antietam, LLC , Associated Radiologists, PA, Diagnostic Imaging Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00662
Plaintiff: Timothy Barrett
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc. and Neubauer Perkins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bockai v. Ruvanni Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2018cv00417
Plaintiff: Sahr Bockai
Defendant: Ruvanni Inc. and Ruth Macauley-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bockai v. Ruvanni, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00417
Plaintiff: Sahr Bockai
Defendant: Ruvanni, Inc. and Ruth Macauley-Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02302
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv01655
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canter v. Shappard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv02545
Plaintiff: Charles R Canter, III
Defendant: Sargent Shappard and Corpal II Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuchs v. Warden
as 8:2015cv02076
Plaintiff: Henry Barrett Fuchs
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Daniel Howard Barrett, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv03816
Plaintiff: James Lyndon Barnes
Defendant: Daniel Howard Barrett, Inc. and Daniel H. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diaz Maradiaga v. Barrett Construction & Restoration, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv03443
Plaintiff: Jose Diaz Maradiaga
Defendant: Barrett Construction & Restoration, LLC and Raymond Barrett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?