Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00511
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MASSEY et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP
as 1:2008cv00435
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATAION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE USA
Plaintiff: MARY L MASSEY and ERA M GORDON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clemmons v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline
as 2:2008cv00023
Plaintiff: Robert L. Clemmons
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Battle et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2008cv00164
Plaintiff: Mary Battle and Robert Battle
Defendant: Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Graves v. SmithKline Beecham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00010
Plaintiff: Albert Graves and Albert Graves
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corp.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Graves v. SmithKline Beecham
as 3:2008cv00155
Plaintiff: Albert Graves and Albert Graves
Defendant: SmithKline Beecham Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Frady et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00107
Plaintiff: William Frady and Linda Frady
Defendant: Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba Glaxosmithkline and GlaxoSmithKline
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beecham et al
as 3:2008cv00039
Plaintiff: Robert Lee Beecham, Alice Faye Ford, Revell Scott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
Rumple v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00374
Plaintiff: Teresa Rumple
Defendant: Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba Glaxosmithkline and GlaxoSmithKline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?