Cases 21 - 30 of 72
King v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Daishawn King
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gentry
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garzon v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Josh Garzon
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Chris Miller
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Brent Gill
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Veasey v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Veasey, II
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
James Adams
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Lobert Johnson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Tony Grimes
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Turman et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Wesley Lance Johnson
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
