Cases 21 - 30 of 192
Bates v. Dyer et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robert Bates
Defendant:
Brad W. Dyer, Billy Joe Gaffin, Officer Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porterfield v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04158
Plaintiff:
Brad D. Porterfield
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04239
Plaintiff:
Karen Ray and Brad Ray
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al
as 2:2022oe04180
Plaintiff:
Karen V Ray and Brad Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al
as 2:2022cv04180
Plaintiff:
Karen V Ray and Brad Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Biden et al
as 3:2021cv00275
Petitioner:
Debora S. Hall
Respondent:
Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Melania Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McNamee-Miller et al v. HMD Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03389
Plaintiff:
Susan McNamee-Miller, Cody McNamee, Susan P. McNamee-Miller and others
Defendant:
HMD Trucking, Inc. and Brad D. Coles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Tingler v. York et al
as 3:2022cv01170
Plaintiff:
Charles Tingler
Defendant:
Brad York, Stephen Levorchick, James VanEerten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tingler v. Levorchick et al
as 3:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Charles Tingler
Defendant:
Stephen Levorchick, Brad York, Kent Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martens v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Defendant:
Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, LLC, Corey L. Tomlinson, City of Findlay and others
Plaintiff:
George Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
