Cases 21 - 30 of 173
Bannister v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Bradley T. Bannister
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Slone v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership et al
as 7:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Shirley Slone
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter #696 and Bradley Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Carter v. Cox et al
as 4:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Sue Carter
Defendant:
Samuel J. Cox, Damon Preston, James Rhorer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Morris v. Green
as 5:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Bradley Tyson Morris
Respondent:
David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Laughner et al
as 6:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bradley Michael Mills
Defendant:
Theo Laughner and GEICO General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Blanton v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Bradley Todd Blanton
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and National Union Fire Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin-Bradley v. Laurel County, KY et al
as 6:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kewan D. Conklin-Bradley
Defendant:
Laurel County, KY, Edith Hensley, Michelle Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
