Cases 21 - 30 of 207
Hubbard v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2023cv02131
Plaintiff:
Courtney M Hubbard
Defendant:
A. Gonzalez, D. Brookhart and J. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Courtney M Hubbard
Defendant:
A Gonzalez, D Brookhart and J Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Kevin Johnson and Jeremiah Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01798
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Fiero, Ms. Elliot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurman v. Brookhart
as 3:2023cv01737
Petitioner:
David Thurman
Respondent:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ealy v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Courtney Ealy
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Brown, Rob Jefferies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Luking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wester v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Wester
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Tiffanie Clark, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2023cv01441
Petitioner:
Raphael Hall and Rapheal Hall
Respondent:
Deanne M Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eitenmiller et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eitenmiller, Nina Eitenmiller, Gregory Gurski and others
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
