Cases 21 - 30 of 41
United States of America v. Carlson
as 1:2016mc91144
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Kerry A. Carlson
Diaz et al v. Devlin et al
as 4:2016cv40039
Plaintiff:
Marianne Diaz , N.M. , B.A. and others
Defendant:
James P. Devlin , Nicholas E. Nason , Jeffrey Carlson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlson v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv30021
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Carlson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carlson et al v. Dipp et al
as 1:2015cv14032
Plaintiff:
Heather Carlson , Philipp Hofmann and Carlos Rivas
Defendant:
Michelle Dipp , Jeffrey E. Young , Richard H. Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carlson et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13246
Plaintiff:
Lauren Carlson and ERICA JOHNSON
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz, Jr. v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2015cv40076
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Gary J. Gemme, Jeffrey P Carlson and others
Plaintiff:
Adalberto Ruiz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Properties, LLC et al v. Worcester et al
as 4:2015cv40009
Plaintiff:
College Hill Properties, LLC , Caro Street Properties, LLC , Clay Street Properties, LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Worcester , Department of Building and Zoning , Department of Health and Housing Inspections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlson et al v. The Gillette Company et al
as 1:2014cv14201
Plaintiff:
Lauren Carlson and Jamal Yusuf
Defendant:
The Gillette Company and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv40091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Erickson et al v. David S. Carlson, d/b/a Carlson's Service Center et al
as 4:2013cv40071
Plaintiff:
Bradford C. Erickson and Jill S. Erickson
Defendant:
David S. Carlson and Constance Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
