Cases 21 - 30 of 95
Molineaux v. Ballard et al
as 2:2015cv03490
Plaintiff:
Keith M. Molineaux, Jr.
Defendant:
David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein, Wexford Health Sources Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01276
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Chandler and L. B. Chandler
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buzzard v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Ryan Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buzzard v. Rubenstein et al
as 3:2015cv00132
Plaintiff:
David Dean Buzzard, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Ryan Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv00214
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Christine Chandler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Chandler v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv14867
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Chandler
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Figaniak et al v. Fraternal Order of Owl's Home Nest et al
as 5:2015cv00111
Plaintiff:
Thomas G. Figaniak and Valerie A. Figaniak
Defendant:
Fraternal Order of Owl's Home Nest , Loyal Order of Owls Nest Lodge 2558, Ye Olde Alpha, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pendleton v. WV Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01903
Plaintiff:
Ricky Vincent Pendleton
Defendant:
Kelli Hinte , Sherrie Snyder , Cheryl Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10448
Plaintiff:
Blanche Chandler
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
