Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Woods v. Departmen of Child and Family Services et al
as 4:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Nikita Woods
Defendant:
Departmen of Child and Family Services, Ike Jessee, Sarah Grotbo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Department of Public Child Services et al
as 9:2013cv00153
Defendant:
Department of Public Child Services, Joni Stormo, Patrick Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Lanica Latrice Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fiechtner v. Camden County Probation Division et al
as 9:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Camden County Probation Division, Child Support Enforcement Divison, 5 Executives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wandering Medicine et al v. McCulloch et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mark Wandering Medicine , Hugh Club Foot , Lenard Elk Shoulder and others
Defendant:
Linda McCulloch , Geraldine Custer , Rosebud County, Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Wood et al
as 9:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tracy M. Wood, State of Montana, Department of Public Health & Human Services, Child Support Enforcement Division and Ravalli County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Walid v. Trettin et al
as 9:2012cv00147
Defendant:
Karen Trettin, David Barnhill, April Amstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Rasta O.K. El Bey D. Walid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bull Child v. USA
as 4:2009cv00110
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Michael Bull Child
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
All American Pharmaceutical and Natural Foods Corp. v. Tallon et al
as 1:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
All American Pharmaceutical and Natural Foods Corp.
Defendant:
Mark J. Tallon, Robert Child and CR-Technologies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
