Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Malava, LLC v. Chism-Hardy Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02033
Plaintiff: Malava, LLC
Defendant: Chism-Hardy Enterprises, LLC , City Brewing, LLC and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chism v. Jamieson
as 2:2010cv02887
Defendant: W. Ray Jamieson
Plaintiff: Alma Chism
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism Hardy Enterprises, LLC v. R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02344
Plaintiff: Chism Hardy Enterprises, LLC
Defendant: R.J. Corman Railroad Group, LLC and R.J. Corman Railroad Company/Memphis Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chism v. Horizon Blue Cross Blueshield of New Jersey
as 3:2009cv00658
Plaintiff: Patricia Chism
Defendant: Horizon Blue Cross Blueshield of New Jersey and Horizon Blue Cross Blueshield of New Jersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
Type: Contract None
Kurita v. State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00948
Plaintiff: Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita, Rosalind Kurita and others
Defendant: State Primary Board of the Tennessee Democratic Party, The, Paula Combs, Larry Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Continental Casualty Company v. Chism Hardy Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02481
Plaintiff: Continental Casualty Company
Defendant: Chism Hardy Enterprises, LLC, Braun Construction Services, LLC and Braun Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract None
Chism v. Seaton Sales & Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv01142
Plaintiff: Jimmie Chism
Defendant: Seaton Sales & Service, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Chism v. Pearson
as 2:2007cv02797
Petitioner: Rodney Bernard Chism
Respondent: Bruce Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?