Cases 21 - 30 of 64
NEELD v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv06294
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM NEELD
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, PAUL K. LAGANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCWHORTER v. SCO. ROMAN et al
as 2:2015cv06338
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCWHORTER
Defendant:
SCO. ROMAN, SGT. KRASOWSKI and CINDY SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horace Branch v. Cindy Sweeney, et al
as 15-2571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORACE BRANCH
Defendant - Appellee:
CINDY SWEENEY, Associate Administrator and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
ORECKINTO v. NELSON et al
as 2:2015cv01316
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ORECKINTO
Defendant:
K. NELSON, D. HUNTER, NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2014cv03165
Plaintiff:
HAKIM KELLY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, MELISSA MATTHEWS, COLM FOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BARNES et al
as 3:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOHNSON
Defendant:
JEFFREY BARNES and CINDY SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTORELLA v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv04308
Plaintiff:
FRANK MARTORELLA
Defendant:
FRANK LAGANA, CINDY SWEENEY, MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv04055
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GREEN
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, CINDY SWEENEY and FRANCIS MEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER et al v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv03642
Plaintiff:
KEITH M. PORTER and RAYMOND E. SALLY
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA, CINDY SWEENEY, CHANDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALLY et al v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv02558
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. SALLY, KEITH M. PORTER, JOSE VILLAFANE and others
Defendant:
PAUL LAGANA and CINDY SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
