Cases 21 - 30 of 96
AT&T Services, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70326
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF ANNE ARUNDEL, MARYLAND, CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH, SOUTH CAROLINA, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND and others
Intervenor:
CITY OF ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON, TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH, CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Huntington Beach v. FCC, et al
as 19-70146
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH
Amicus Curiae:
MISSOURI BASIN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, BERKSHIRE-LITCHFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ASSOCIATION, MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND ARKANSAS MUNICIPAL POWER ASSOCIATION and others
City of San Jose, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70144
Petitioner:
CITY OF ARCADIA, Calfornia, CITY OF MONTEREY, California, CITY OF PIEDMONT, California and others
Intervenor:
COMPETITIVE CARRIERS ASSOCIATION, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CTIA - THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
City of Seattle, et al v. FCC, et al
as 19-70136
Intervenor:
CITY OF BELLEVUE, Washington, CITY OF LACEY, Washington, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada and others
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES, CITY OF SEATTLE, Washington, LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Sprint Corporation v. FCC, et al
as 19-70123
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
SPRINT CORPORATION
Puerto Rico Telephone Company, v. FCC, et al
as 19-70125
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC.
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 19-70124
Intervenor:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Nevada, CITY OF YUMA, Arizona, CITY OF ISSAQUAH, Washington and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Petitioner:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Matthew Krechmery v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Javier Nunez, City of Ontario, Raymond Wilburn and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Krechmery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Kacey Sawyer v. City of Ontario et al
as 5:2018cv01613
Plaintiff:
Kacey Sawyer
Defendant:
City of Ontario and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company v. City of Ontario, et al
as 5:2018cv01117
Counter Claimant:
City of Ontario, City of Ontario and City of Ontario
Defendant:
City of Ontario and Does
Counter Defendant:
MCC Pipeline, Inc., MCC Pipeline, Inc., MCC Pipeline, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
