Cases 21 - 30 of 137
FRAZIER v. THE CITY OF PHILA
as 2:2018cv00827
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON et al v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2017cv05696
Plaintiff:
MAMIE LAWSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY, BUREAU ADMIN. ADJUDICATION, RICHARD DICKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2017cv05060
Plaintiff:
JULIO STEVEN JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CITY OF PHILA PA, COMMON WEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. THE CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv04608
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. THE STATE OF PENN et al
as 2:2017cv04597
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
THE STATE OF PENN and THE CITY OF PHILA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
PRATER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv03203
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, CITY OF PHILA LICENSE AND INSPECTION COMMISSIONER, JOHN MANDROS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02338
Plaintiff:
ARDELL KENNEDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES KENNEY, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARLEY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
MARY HARLEY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ENTIRE CITY COUNCIL STAFF, JANIE BLACKWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEADEN v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GLENN HEADEN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. and DETENTION CENTER STATE ROAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPEARMAN v. CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF et al
as 2:2016cv05268
Plaintiff:
MELVIN SPEARMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, CFCF, RASOL HINTON, C. EAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
