Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Rivera et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
Victoriano G. Rivera and Lorenza A. Rivera
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Recontrust Company and Samuel I. White, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saunders v. Stevens-Saunders et al
as 1:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Antonio Saunders
Defendant:
Malissa Stevens-Saunders, Capital One Home Loans, Jason McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Carter et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00651
Plaintiff:
Dannie R. Carter and Dorothy M. Carter
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Seasons Mortgage, Inc., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
NGM Insurance Company v. Secured Title & Abstract, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00536
Plaintiff:
NGM Insurance Company and NGM Insurance Company
Defendant:
Secured Title & Abstract, Inc., Larry T. Davis, Janelle M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
NGM Insurance Company v. Roger J. McDonald & Associates, P.C. et al
as 3:2007cv00410
Plaintiff:
NGM Insurance Company
Defendant:
Roger J. McDonald & Associates, P.C., Roger J. McDonald, Cary A. Ralston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Rawles et al v. Citywide Mortgage Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Rawles, Rufus M. Rawles, Rufus M. Rawles and others
Defendant:
Citywide Mortgage Corporation and Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
