Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Coenen v. Naphcare et al
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Brendan R Coenen
Defendant:
Naphcare and Washoe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Washoe County Jail Medical Department
as 3:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John-Jason Cummings
Defendant:
Washoe County Jail Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Medical, Washoe County Jail
as 3:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John-Jason Cummings
Defendant:
Medical, Washoe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davitt v. Elko County Jail
as 3:2022cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Davitt
Respondent:
Elko County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Washoe County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
John K. Freeman
Defendant:
Washoe County Detention Facility and Washoe County Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Naphcare et al
as 3:2021cv00513
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Allen
Defendant:
Naphcare, Dietitions, Sheriff Balam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Clark County et al
as 2:2021cv02023
Plaintiff:
John Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Clark County, Clark Detention Center, Clark County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv01077
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Memphis Police Department, Head Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martinez aka Daniel Rodriguez (true name) #1068838 v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
James Martinez and Daniel Rodriguez (true name)
Defendant:
County of Washoe, State of Nevada, Figuroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
