Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Padgett v. Byerly et al
as 6:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Captain Alvis, Sgt. Arnoux, T. Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeley v. Skrah et al
as 1:2016cv00603
Defendant:
Jeanette Davidson, Woody Lugo, Valarie Neese and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Ray Yeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig v. Villicana et al
as 6:2016cv00513
Plaintiff:
Kimball Craig
Defendant:
Judge Matthew Donahue, Carla Page and Jorge Alejendro Villicana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Skrah et al
as 1:2016cv00492
Defendant:
Kathie Carden, Lt. Jeanette Davidson, Sgt. Woody Lugo and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dean Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sammons v. Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon et al
as 3:2015cv01703
Defendant:
Board of Trustees, Oregon Bakers Union Trust Fund, Oregon Bakers Union Trust Fund and Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Carla Sammons
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Emery v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv01227
Defendant:
Nurse Ann, T. Bailey, T. Byerly and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodd v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00270
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Carla Rae Dodd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanchez-Alfonso v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 3:2014cv01002
Respondent:
Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and Carla Pinto
Petitioner:
Luis Sanchez-Alfonso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00250
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Carla Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
