Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Chappell v. Ingenious Med, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02444
Plaintiff:
Sunnie Chappell
Defendant:
Ingenious Med, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
TAYLOR et al v. BIG LOTS STORES, INC. et al
as 4:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
ALICE TAYLOR , DEXTER ASH , DONICE CHAPPELL, II and others
Defendant:
BIG LOTS STORES, INC. and GARY BOATWRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chappell v. Mclaughlin
as 1:2016cv00208
Petitioner:
KELVIN G CHAPPELL
Respondent:
MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMALLBIZPROS INC v. CHAPPEL
as 3:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
SMALLBIZPROS INC
Defendant:
TODD CHAPPEL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127
Chappell v. USA
as 5:2016cv00263
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Carey Gilbert Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chappell & Co., Inc. et al v. JSH & Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01171
Plaintiff:
Chappell & Co., Inc. , WB Music Corp. , Lit Up Music and others
Defendant:
JSH & Associates, Inc. and Sean D. Hudgens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Black Box Royalties, Inc. et al v. Rhino Entertainment Company et al
as 1:2015cv04012
Plaintiff:
Black Box Royalties, Inc. and Albert Maria-Jansen
Defendant:
Rhino Entertainment Company, Atlantic Recording Corporation, Warner Music Group Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv02065
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
