Cases 21 - 30 of 162
Jones v. Cerasa et al
as 3:2022cv50120
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Ray Jones
Defendant:
David Cerasa, Edwards, Other Unknown Officers Rockford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond et al v. City Of Rockford et al
as 1:2021cv06742
Plaintiff:
Xavier Redmond, Natasha Hayward and Officer Josh Carpenter
Defendant:
City Of Rockford and Officer Irvin Benitez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lonnell Fort v. City of Rockford, Illinois, et al
as 21-3276
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNELL I. FORT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ORIGINAL STATE ATTORNEY and others
J. Doe v. State of Illinois, et al
as 21-2830
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
J. Doe v. State of Illinois, et al
as 21-2812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J. DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS, WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Holliman v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2021cv50265
Plaintiff:
Anthony Holliman
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Samual McNutt, Kevin Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Detective Danforth et al
as 3:2021cv50199
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Detective St. Vincent, Detective Danforth and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnqiz Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Detective Danforth et al
as 1:2021cv02631
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Detective St. Vincent, Detective Danforth and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnqiz Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
