Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Kelly et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2018cv01301
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Bernardo, Randy Martinez, Karen Essendrop and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Connor v. Bill Barrett Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00323
Plaintiff:
Howard Connor
Defendant:
Bill Barrett Corporation, Jim W. Mogg, William F. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Collins v. Santini et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Plaintiff:
Willie Eugene Collins
Defendant:
Santini, Conroy, Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abrar v. USA et al
as 1:2017cv03068
Plaintiff:
Shani Nurant Sheikh Abrar
Defendant:
USA, Joe Moorehead, J. Gunther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeppelin et al v. Federal Highway Administration
as 1:2017cv01661
Plaintiff:
Kyle Zeppelin , Brad Evans , Christine O'Connor and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
O'Connor v. RAM International 1 LLC, et al
as 1:2017cv01497
Plaintiff:
Asia O'Connor
Defendant:
RAM International 1 LLC and Westminster 73 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huerta v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Huerta
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Oliver, Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
O'Connor v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv02382
Plaintiff:
Michael R. O'Connor
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Mary Carlson and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Bruggeman Hatch et al
as 1:2016cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jon A. Goodwin
Defendant:
Marcia Ann Bruggeman Hatch, Seamus John Paul Hatch, Michael Douglas Bock and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
