Cases 21 - 30 of 236
Antoine Bruce v. Constance Reese, et al
as 10-14896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, Warden, BECKY CLAY, Associate Warden, J. SAVIDGE, Associate Warden and others
Deen-Mitchell v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv02802
Plaintiff:
Wallace Deen-Mitchell
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Officials et al
as 1:2008cv02402
Petitioner:
Gregory Lejuan Cook
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Officials, Warden Constance Reese, R Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
-RRA Hamalowa v. Holt et al
as 1:2010cv02515
Plaintiff:
Clifton Hamalowa
Defendant:
Ray Holt, Constance Reese, D. Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamalowa v. Holt et al
as 1:2010cv02826
Plaintiff:
Clifton Hamalowa
Defendant:
Ray Holt, Constance Reese, D. Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
To v. Elston et al
as 1:2010cv02401
Plaintiff:
Conghau Huu To
Defendant:
William Elston, Becky Clay, Constance Reese and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin Guzman-Garcia v. Constance Reese, et al
as 10-13651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWIN I GUZMAN-GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
CONSTANCE REESE, BECKY CLAY, GREG SMITH and others
MURCHISON v. BLEDSOE et al
as 1:2010cv01452
Petitioner:
KENNETH MURCHISON
Respondent:
BLEDSOE, Constance Reese, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rourke v. Holt et al
as 1:2010cv01291
Plaintiff:
Donald Rourke
Defendant:
Raymond Holt, Constance Reese, Joseph Savidge and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURCHISON v. BLEDSOE et al
as 1:2010cv00812
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MURCHISON
Defendant:
BLEDSOE, CONSTANCE REESE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
