Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Ramsey v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2017cv08062
Plaintiff:
Jay David Ramsey
Defendant:
Donovan Schmidt, Correct Care Solutions, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wickerham v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08047
Plaintiff:
James R Wickerham, II
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, GEO Incorporated, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bivens v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00475
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, GEO Group Incorporated, Bernie Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bivens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv08018
Plaintiff:
Gary Jerome Harper
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Lori Schott, Rafael Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 3:2017cv08003
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Sampson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Pima County Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2016cv00785
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harold Reed
Defendant:
Pima County Adult Detention Center, Pima, County of, Pima County Adult Detention Center Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez v. Khalif et al
as 3:2016cv08180
Plaintiff:
David Quintin Melendez
Defendant:
Unknown Khalif, Unknown Mortenson, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Triplett v. Godfrey et al
as 3:2016cv08009
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ernest Triplett
Defendant:
Thomas K Godfrey, Correct Care Solutions Medical, Corizon Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Early et al v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Keith Early and Tammy Early
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Charles L Ryan , Unknown Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goerg v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2015cv08298
Plaintiff:
Ricky Goerg
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, Unknown Martinez, Unknown Klinemack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
