Cases 21 - 30 of 102
Crutchfield v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Marell Tyrone Crutchfield
Defendant:
Warden Jeffery Artrip and Unknown Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealson v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Christian Thomas Nealson
Defendant:
Reynolds, S.K. Coleman, Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Draper et al
as 7:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Blane Doyle
Defendant:
Sheriff Steve Draper, 1st Lt. Law, Capt. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chiarky v. Joyer
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Paul Chiarky
Defendant:
Unknown and Correctional Officer Joyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roscoe v. Sawyers
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Sawyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Dunlevy et al
as 3:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Demetric Venable
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Dunlevy and Tony M. Darden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wargas v. Watts et al
as 7:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Tristan Joseph Wargas
Defendant:
Major J. Watts, Sergent Rose, Sergent J. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Davon Brashir Martin
Defendant:
Lt. Hamilton, Correctional Officer Rondal White, Correctional Officer Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Michael Williams, Unit Manager Larry Ross Collins, Captain Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Hayes et al
as 7:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Pres Huffman
Defendant:
Captain Josh Hayes and Correctional Officer A. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
