Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Scott v. Valdez, et al.
as 2:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott
Defendant:
B. Valdez, N. Korkow, J. Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Valdez, et al.
as 1:2017cv00777
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott
Defendant:
B. Valdez, N. Korkow, J. Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Thompson et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Curtis Scott Williams
Defendant:
Terry Thompson, Klint Anderson, Kevin Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company v. Langager
as 4:2016cv00685
Plaintiff:
Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Defendant:
Curtis Scott Langager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Scott v. Biter
as 1:2016cv00386
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
M. D. Biter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Curtis Scott
as 16-1328
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CURTIS SCOTT
United States of America v. Jones (Jones)
as 14-2340
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathan Medina, Derrick Woods, AKA Sergeant Woods, Curtis Scott and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jaired Jones
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al vs. Curtis Hedlund Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01398
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Los Angeles, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 105 Retiree Health Plan and others
Defendant:
Curtis Hedlund Corporation, Carl Lards Hedlund and Curtis Scott Hedlund
First Mercury Insurance Company v. Elete Guard Forces and Escort Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03735
Plaintiff:
First Mercury Insurance Company
Defendant:
Elete Guard Forces and Escort Service, Inc., Christopher Hambrick, Bertha Thomas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
