Cases 21 - 30 of 712
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HINES v. FARRINGTON
as 1:2023cv03397
Plaintiff:
DASHON HINES
Defendant:
DANIEL E. FARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ISHAK v. GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
AKUA ISHAK
Defendant:
GREENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE CARMONA, CEDRIC BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERNSTEIN v. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY et al
as 1:2023cv02938
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. BERNSTEIN
Defendant:
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
BURRESS-EL v. DUKE ENERGY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02967
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN BURRESS-EL
Defendant:
ROCCO O. D'ASENZO, BOB MCMAHON, LARISA M. VAYSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
JENKINS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv02825
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
JEREMY SMITH, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, PROVIDENCE FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. COHN et al
as 1:2023cv02826
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
JAMIESON V. COHN, RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, PROVIDENCE FIRE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
