Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00867
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Miller v. UTMB et al.
as 4:2012cv00813
Plaintiff:
David L. Miller
Defendant:
UTMB et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Penninsula Advisors et al v. Fairstar Resources
as 2:2011mc00819
Plaintiff:
Penninsula Advisors and AIP Resort Development
Defendant:
Fairstar Resources
Trustee:
David L. Miller
Petitioner:
David M. Wahlquist
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00323
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
David L. Miller v. UTMB et. al.,
as 4:2010cv03341
Plaintiff:
David L. Miller
Defendant:
UTMB, Sheri Talley, Keith Sedel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Brown et al
as 9:2010cv01065
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
William D. Brown, Sheryl Butler, John W. Carvill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownridge v. Miller
as 10-3082
Petitioner - Appellant:
Samuel Brownridge
Respondent - Appellee:
David L. Miller, Superintendent
Madison v. Wright
as 10-2655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diallo Rafik Asar Madison
Defendant:
M.D Lester N. Wright, Associate Commissioner, Health Services, D.J., Deputy Superintendent of Administration of Fishkill Correctional Facility, David L. Miller, Superintendent of Eastern Correctional Facility and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. J. Alves, at Southport Correctional Facility and K. Dyal, Nurse at Southport Correctional Facility (Jointly, severally and individually)
Wicks v. Miller
as 10-1181
Petitioner - Appellant:
Conrad Wicks
Respondent - Appellee:
David L. Miller, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility-Napanoch, New York
Mackensy v. Miller
as 1:2000cv09296
Petitioner:
Jose Mackensy
Respondent:
David L. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
